Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na in Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. In the first part of the study, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be assigned by chance either to the group that will be treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na (about 100 patients will be in this group) or, to the group that will be treated with Gemcitabine only (about 50 patients will be in this group). How long patients survive in the 2 groups will be compared. If it looks like there is no difference between the groups, the study will stop. If it looks like patients in the group that were treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na survive longer, the study will continue into a second part where more patients will be treated in order to confirm and better understand the findings of the first part of the study.

Sex

All

Minimum age

18 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients at least 18 years old presenting with histopathologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; metastatic disease is defined as disease which has spread beyond the peri-pancreatic lymph nodes.
* Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, including adjuvant chemotherapy.
* Measurable disease, defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension with longest diameter (LD) ≥20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan; measurable lymph nodes must be ≥15 mm in the short axis.
* ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.
* Patients must have adequate renal function and serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL.
* Patients must have adequate liver function as defined by total bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dL and transaminase levels no higher than 3.0 times the institution's upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with hepatic metastases may have transaminase levels of up to 5.0 times the ULN.
* All patients must have a serum albumin ≥3.0 g/dL.
* Patients must have adequate bone marrow (BM) function as defined by a granulocyte count ≥1,500/mm3, a platelet count ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin \>9 g/dL.
* Disease-free period of more than 5 years from prior malignancies other than pancreas (except curatively treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix and ductal carcinoma in situ \[DCIS\] breast disease).
* Adequate contraceptive regimen (including prescription oral contraceptives \[birth control pills\], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device \[IUD\], double-barrier method \[spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm\], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study for female patients of reproductive potential or female partners of male patients.
* Female patient with reproductive potential must have a negative urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) pregnancy test at Screening.
* Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
* Patient must have signed an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with unresectable locally advanced disease without evidence of disease elsewhere.
* Life expectancy of less than 12 weeks.
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or seizure disorder.
* Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
* Symptomatic or clinically evident ascites.
* Serum sodium less than 130 mEq/L or conditions that may predispose patients to hyponatremia.
* Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
* Male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements described in this protocol.
* Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start.
* Evidence of brain metastases.
* Any concurrent administration and/or prior administration within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug, of radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.
* Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements, or inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures (e.g., drug addition, chronic non-compliance, etc.).

• BACKGROUNDJimeno A, Chan A, Cusatis G, Zhang X, Wheelhouse J, Solomon A, Chan F, Zhao M, Cosenza SC, Ramana Reddy MV, Rudek MA, Kulesza P, Donehower RC, Reddy EP, Hidalgo M. Evaluation of the novel mitotic modulator ON 01910.Na in pancreatic cancer and preclinical development of an ex vivo predictive assay. Oncogene. 2009 Jan 29;28(4):610-8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.424. Epub 2008 Nov 24. PMID 19029951
• BACKGROUNDJimeno A, Li J, Messersmith WA, Laheru D, Rudek MA, Maniar M, Hidalgo M, Baker SD, Donehower RC. Phase I study of ON 01910.Na, a novel modulator of the Polo-like kinase 1 pathway, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5504-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9788. Epub 2008 Oct 27. PMID 18955447
• RESULTO'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler AL, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw095. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available. PMID 26945010
• RESULTO'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Leichman L, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2505. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv477. Epub 2015 Oct 21. No abstract available. PMID 26489442
• RESULTO'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19.