Clinical trial · Interventional
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colonic Resection
Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colonic Resection- a Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Laparoscopic (key-hole) large bowel resection is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. While epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for open colo-rectal procedures it can be associated with significant complications and may delay hospital discharge in laparoscopic procedures. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and sedation and reduced bowel motility which can also prolong recovery. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, earlier return of bowel function and earlier hospital discharge. The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in our hospital and a retrospective audit demonstrated better analgesia and lower consumption of morphine in the TAP block group.The differences were not statistically significant as the number patients in the audit were not large enough.The investigators are hoping that this study will demonstrate that the difference is real by recruiting the necessary number of patients into each group (36 per group)
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colonic Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Colonic Diverticulum | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Rectal Cancer | Malignant Rectal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
| Ulcerative Colitis | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local anaesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) bock | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- TAP block
- description
- Patients in this arm will receive ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) bock
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Local anaesthetic infiltration
- description
- Laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site will be infiltrated with a total of 40 mls 0.25% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Local anaesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites
Primary outcomes (1)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. * Undergoing elective laparoscopic high anterior resection without stoma or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. * American Society of Anaesthetists physical status (ASA) 1-3 Exclusion Criteria: * Opioid tolerance * Chronic abdominal pain * Allergy/Intolerance: Morphine, local anaesthetics * BMI\>35 Kg/M2 * Previous major abdominal surgery * High likelihood of conversion to open procedure * Patients unable to communicate in written and spoken English * Weight less than 50 kg
References
Publications (4)
- BACKGROUNDZafar N, Davies R, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. The evolution of analgesia in an 'accelerated' recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Feb;12(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01768.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16. PMID 19207712
- BACKGROUNDMcDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f. PMID 17179269
- BACKGROUNDMcDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.03.011. PMID 17961838
- BACKGROUNDEl-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, Kapral S, Marhofer P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):763-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep067. Epub 2009 Apr 17. PMID 19376789