Clinical trial · Interventional
Drug-eluting Bead in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Multicenter Registry of Chemoembolization Using Drug-eluting Bead in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE using Lipiodol/anti cancer agent emulsion is the standard treatment and reported as a significantly better treatment through randomized comparison study like Llovet, etc. than conservative treatment. Recently, doctors do transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting bead, and it is proved less side effect and better efficacy than conventional TACE using Lipiodol in Precision V study by Dr. Lammer, etc. But, it could not defined improved survival rate as expected. This study's purpose is evaluating treatment efficacy, survival rate and safety of TACE using drug eluting bead by comparing to conventional TACE using doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| DebDox TACE | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- chemoembolization
- description
- HCC patients received chemoembolization
- interventionNames
- Procedure: DebDox TACE
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Historical use of c-TACE using Lipiodiol and doxorubicin
- description
- The control arm will be of the patients that have been treated historically in the centers with conventional TACE (that is Lipiodiol plus doxorubicin).
- interventionNames
- Procedure: DebDox TACE
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- tumor response
- timeFrame
- 6 months
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HCC as stated below
* Cirrhotic subjects: Clinical diagnosis by AASLD criteria
* Non-cirrhotic subjects: histological confirmation is mandatory
2. Patient with HCC not suitable for radical therapies such as resection, liver transplantation or percutaneous therapies or patient is indicated for these therapies but there is a contraindication for them or patient himself rejects above treatments and wants to do TACE (Indication for hepatectomy, liver transplantation, local ablation is decided by doctors of each center)
3. Multinodular or single nodular tumor over 5cm, (In the case of single nodule less than 5cm, if curative treatment is contraindicated or the patient rejects curative treatment)
4. Hypervascular lesion showing contrast enhancement in the early stage at the contrast media bolus injection CT or MRI.
5. At least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable according to the Modified RECIST criteria by CT-scan or MRI
6. No invasion in the blood vessel (hepatic portal, hepatic vein) or bile duct by the CT or MR
7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status is 0 - 1
8. Child-Pugh classification is A or B7
9. Proper blood, liver, renal, heart function: testing result within 2 weeks from registry of this study is followed:
* white blood cell number : \> 3,000/mm2
* platelet number : \> 5 x 104/mm3
* blood bilirubin : \< 3.0 mg/dL
* ASL, ALT is within 5 times of normal range of each organ
* serum creatinine : \< 1.5 mg/dL
* hemoglobin : \> 8.0 g/dL
10. Over 20 years old
11. Expected survival more than 6 months
12. Patients who are willing to do regular visit, laboratory test, and radiological exam
13. Prior written patient consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. ECOG performance status 2 or more, Child-Pugh class B8 or more
2. Diffuse HCC or presence of vascular or biliary invasion or extrahepatic spread.
3. Vascular or biliary invasion
4. Extrahepatic metastasis (Any lymph nodes measuring ≥ 10mm along the short axis)
5. Tumor burden involving more than 50% of the liver
6. Patients previously treated with any anti-cancer therapy for HCC except hepatic resection or early recurrence within 1 year after resection
7. Liver cancer rupture
8. History of biliary tract repair or endoscopic biliary tract treatment
9. Clinically important refractory ascites or pleural fluid
10. Any contraindications for hepatic embolization procedures
* Known hepatofugal blood flow
* Arterio-venous shunt
* Impaired clotting test (platelet count \< 5 x 104/mm3, PT-INR \> 2.0)
11. Any contraindication for doxorubicin administration
12. Contrast media allergy contraindicating angiography
13. Acute or active following diseases
* Heart failure can't control, angina pectoris and/or arrhythmia diseases
* Myocardial infarction within the last 6months,
* Renal failure
* Active infection (virus infection can be accepted)
* Active hemorrhage of digestive system
* Other malignant tumor history
* Hepatic coma or acute mental disease
14. Pregnant, nursing or childbearing age women and men who are actively sexually available and don't want to or can't do contraception
15. Safety concerns based on researcher's judgeReferences
Publications (11)
- BACKGROUNDDhanasekaran R, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Kauh JS, Khanna V, Kim HS. Comparison of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoembolization with doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEB) for unresectable hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC). J Surg Oncol. 2010 May 1;101(6):476-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.21522. PMID 20213741
- BACKGROUNDMalagari K, Pomoni M, Kelekis A, Pomoni A, Dourakis S, Spyridopoulos T, Moschouris H, Emmanouil E, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Prospective randomized comparison of chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and bland embolization with BeadBlock for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9750-0. Epub 2009 Nov 24. PMID 19937027
- BACKGROUNDMalagari K, Pomoni M, Spyridopoulos TN, Moschouris H, Kelekis A, Dourakis S, Alexopoulou E, Koskinas J, Angelopoulos M, Kornezos J, Pomoni A, Tandeles S, Marinis A, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Safety profile of sequential transcatheter chemoembolization with DC Bead: results of 237 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Aug;34(4):774-85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0044-3. Epub 2010 Dec 24. PMID 21184228
- BACKGROUNDNicolini A, Martinetti L, Crespi S, Maggioni M, Sangiovanni A. Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.038. Epub 2010 Jan 22. PMID 20097098
- BACKGROUNDPoon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW, Ng KK, Woo R, Tai KS, Fan ST. A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jul 12. PMID 17627902
- BACKGROUNDLammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, Pitton M, Sergent G, Pfammatter T, Terraz S, Benhamou Y, Avajon Y, Gruenberger T, Pomoni M, Langenberger H, Schuchmann M, Dumortier J, Mueller C, Chevallier P, Lencioni R; PRECISION V Investigators. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Feb;33(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9711-7. Epub 2009 Nov 12.