Clinical trial · Interventional
Randomized Study of ON 01910.Na in Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients With Excess Blasts
Phase III MultiCenter Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of ON 01910.Na 72-Hr Continuous IV Infusion in MDS Patients With Excess Blasts Relapsing After or Refractory to or Intolerant to Azacitidine or Decitabine
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) to OS of patients receiving BSC in a population of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts (5% to 30% bone marrow blasts) who have failed azacitidine or decitabine treatment. This patient population has no available therapy and a short life expectancy (approximately 4 months). The high level of bone marrow activity of ON 01910.Na documented in Phase 1 and 2 studies has the potential to delay substantially the transition of MDS to Acute Myeloid Leukemia(AML), a very significant and severe complication, which shortens survival of these MDS patients.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia | Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| MDS | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Myelodysplastic Syndromes | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| RAEB | Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Excess Blasts | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| ON 01910.Na | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC)
- description
- Patients will receive ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards and best supportive care (BSC).
- interventionNames
- Drug: ON 01910.Na
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Best supportive care (BSC)
- description
- Patients will receive best supportive care (BSC).
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Overall survival
- timeFrame
- Up to 18 months
- description
- Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death or progression, even if they have discontinued treatment for whatever cause. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive. The OS primary analysis will compare the active ON 01910.Na regimen to BSC once a total number of 223 deaths has been reached.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * MDS diagnosis confirmed within 6 weeks prior to entry according to WHO or FAB classification * MDS classified as follows, according to WHO and FAB classification: * RAEB-1 (5% - 9% BM blasts) * RAEB-2 (10% - 19% BM blasts) * CMML (10% - 20% BM blasts) and WBC \< 13,000/μL * RAEB-t (20% - 30% BM blasts), with following criteria: * o WBC \< 25 x 10E9/L at entry * o Stable WBC at least 4 weeks prior to entry and not requiring intervention for WBC control with hydroxyurea, chemotherapy, or leukopheresis. * At least one cytopenia (ANC \< 1800/µL or platelet count \< 100,000/µL or hemoglobin \<10 g/dL) * Progression according to 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria any time after start of azacitidine or decitabine during past 2 years; or failure to achieve complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG) after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or relapse after initial complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG criteria) observed after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or, intolerance to azacitidine or decitabine defined by drug-related ≥Grade 3 liver or renal toxicity leading to discontinuation during the past 2 years. * Did not respond to, relapsed after, not eligible for, or opted not to do bone marrow transplantation * Off other MDS treatments for at least 4 weeks; Filgrastim (G-CSF) and erythropoietin allowed before and during the study as clinically indicated. * No need for induction chemotherapy * ECOG status 0, 1 or 2 * Willing to adhere to protocol prohibitions and restrictions * Patient (or a legally authorized representative) must sign informed consent form to indicate patient's understanding study's purpose and procedures and willingness to participate Exclusion Criteria: * Anemia due to factors other than MDS (including hemolysis or gastrointestinal bleeding) unless stabilized for 1 week after RBC transfusion. * Any active malignancy within the past year, except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia * Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy * Total bilirubin ≥1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease. * Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL * Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<130 mEq/L) * Pregnant or lactating females * Patients unwilling to follow strict contraception requirements (including condom use for males with sexual partners, and for females: prescription oral contraceptives \[birth control pills\], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm\], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study * Females with reproductive potential who do not have a negative urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test at screening * Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start * Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg) * New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to first dose of ON 01910.Na) or poorly controlled seizures * Any other concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy * Prior treatment with low-dose cytarabine during past 2 years Investigational therapy within 4 weeks of starting ON 01910.Na * Psychiatric illness or social situation that limits the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements
References
Publications (6)
- BACKGROUNDSeetharam M, Fan AC, Tran M, Xu L, Renschler JP, Felsher DW, Sridhar K, Wilhelm F, Greenberg PL. Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Sep 14. PMID 21924492
- BACKGROUNDAthuluri-Divakar SK, Vasquez-Del Carpio R, Dutta K, Baker SJ, Cosenza SC, Basu I, Gupta YK, Reddy MV, Ueno L, Hart JR, Vogt PK, Mulholland D, Guha C, Aggarwal AK, Reddy EP. A Small Molecule RAS-Mimetic Disrupts RAS Association with Effector Proteins to Block Signaling. Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):643-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.045. PMID 27104980
- RESULTGarcia-Manero G, Fenaux P, Al-Kali A, Baer MR, Sekeres MA, Roboz GJ, Gaidano G, Scott BL, Greenberg P, Platzbecker U, Steensma DP, Kambhampati S, Kreuzer KA, Godley LA, Atallah E, Collins R Jr, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Wilhelm FE, Azarnia N, Silverman LR; ONTIME study investigators. Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9. PMID 26968357
- RESULTNavada SC, Silverman LR. The safety and efficacy of rigosertib in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Aug;16(8):805-10. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1209413. Epub 2016 Jul 15. PMID 27400247
- RESULTAl-Kali A. Relationship of bone marrow blast (BMBL) response to overall survival (OS) in a multicenter study of rigosertib (Rigo) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts progressing on or after treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35:15_suppl, 7056-7056 ASCO 2017
- RESULTGarcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.