Clinical trial · Observational
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Video to Enhance Advance Care Planning in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients
The Use of a CPR Video to Enhance Advance Care Planning in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Tria
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Advance care planning involves thinking about choices if the patient becomes sick, and is important for everyone. It does not matter if the patients are ill or healthy. It is especially important for people who have diseases that cannot be cured. It allows people to make sure their wishes are respected if they become very sick or are dying. Thinking about these issues can be upsetting. But, for many people, it is helpful. This type of discussion can help the family learn what the patient may want but cannot tell them when these decisions need to be made
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreas and Hepatobiliary Cancer Patients | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) narrative script and questionnaires | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
| (CPR) video and questionnaires | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) video
- description
- This pilot study involves a two-arm parallel design comparing the effectiveness of a CPR video versus a CPR narrative script in advance directive (AD) completion over a 1 month time frame post intervention.
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: (CPR) video and questionnaires
- label
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) narrative script
- description
- This pilot study involves a two-arm parallel design comparing the effectiveness of a CPR video versus a CPR narrative in advance directive (AD) completion over a 1 month timeframe post intervention.
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) narrative script and questionnaires
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- To document advance directive (AD)completion
- timeFrame
- 1 month post-test
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Primary pancreatic or hepatobiliary cancer (including ampullary carcinoma)as well as gastric and/or esophageal cancers, excluding neuroendocrine histology * Progressive disease: Locally advanced or metastatic disease with progression on at least one course of treatment (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy), or untreated patients unfit for therapy because of comorbidities or ECOG performance status \>2, and finally, patients with ECOG performance status 2 -- patients must have discussed on at least one occasion with the treating investigator oncologist that their cancer cannot be cured * In the estimation of the treating physician investigator, life expectancy ≤ 1 year * Known to a GI medical oncology MSKCC clinic: Patients who have already established a relationship with a GI medical oncologist (who is an investigator on this protocol) after at least one new visit in the clinic (or as an in-patient), have MSKCC pathologist confirmed cancer of an above histology, and express an initial intent to be followed primarily at MSKCC * English speaking\* * Able to provide informed consent * Age greater than or equal to 18 years * Do not have an advance directive or living will \* English is the validated language in one of the study tools, and the language in which information is communicated in the narrative and video. Exclusion Criteria: * Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score of less than "intact mental functioning" (3 or more errors). SPMSQ in appendix. * Any patient psychological state deemed by the treating physician to pose any risk of psychological harm by issues raised in a discussion of the trial, or in its testing procedures. Any subject who may become upset during any aspect or discussion of the study will be offered counseling services.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available