Clinical trial · Interventional
Anidulafungin in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Anidulafungin in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies - An Open-label, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile at Prophylactic and Therapeutic Dosages
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): reduced recruitment rate due to non infectious, but competitive trials at our institution
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Study objectives To evaluate the safety of the echinocandin anidulafungin for prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in hematologic patients. Study design, Study conduct period Prospective, open label, phase II, one arm, single centre study October 2009 - September 2010 Study population Twenty adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a hematologic disorder and an indication for antifungal prophylaxis or therapy, but a relative contraindication for azoles or polyenes due to hepatic and renal dysfunction respectively Methods and Main Out-come Variables Main Outcome Parameter Safety: Adverse events and changes of important laboratory parameters with clinical impact will be reported. Secondary Outcome Parameter Efficacy: In therapeutically use the outcome will be categorized into success or failure. For patients receiving anidulafungin as prophylaxis the number and rate of breakthrough infections will be documented. Risk assessment Treatment related adverse effects as reported in the approved physician prescribing information (usually mild and with an incidence of \< 5%). Treatment failure due to resistant pathogens. Expected benefit from this study IFI is a major cause of death among hematological patients, especially those undergoing high dose chemotherapy. It is conceivable that anidulafungin is a new treatment option for patients in whom azoles or polyenes are relatively contraindicated.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hematologic Malignancies | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anidulafungin | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Anidulafungin, safety, antifungal drug
- description
- single arm study
- interventionNames
- Drug: Anidulafungin
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Safety: incidence of (serious)adverse events and changes of important laboratory parameters (in particular liver and renal function parameters) with clinical impact will be reported.
- timeFrame
- day 1-5, 10 , end of treatment and study.
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
- pharmacokinetics and efficacy: As prophylaxis: the number of breakthrough infections. As treatment: complete and partial response rate (success); stable, progression and death (Failure)
- timeFrame
- day 5 (pharmacokinetics), end of treatment, week 6 and 12 (efficacy)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a hematologic disorder AND an indication for IFI prophylaxis or therapy, but a relative contraindication for azoles or polyenes due to hepatic or renal dysfunction\*, are scheduled to receive anidulafungin for one of the following specific indications: * Need for primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with Acute leucaemia/MDS during induction, reinduction or consolidation chemotherapy (who are expected to become neutropenic for at least 10 days) OR after allogenic HSCT with GvHD (at least grade II or more - systemic steroid treatment required) * Need for secondary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with the history of a proven or probable invasive fungal infection who are expected to become neutropenic during induction, reinduction or consolidation chemotherapy * Indication for treatment of proven\*\*, probable or possible fungal infection: * Neutropenic patients with fever resistant to antibiotics (empirical use) * Neutropenic patients with fever resistant to antibiotics and additive laboratory or imaging signs of IFI (preemptive use) * Patients who failed other antifungal therapy due to intolerance or progressive infection Exclusion Criteria: * Absence of written informed consent * Female patients who are pregnant or lactating * Use of anidulafungin within 30 days prior to study * Known hypersensitivity to anidulafungin * Proven IFI with pathogen of known resistance to echinocandins (e.g. zygomycetes) * Life expectancy less than 1 month * Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
References
Publications (7)
- BACKGROUNDDamle BD, Dowell JA, Walsky RL, Weber GL, Stogniew M, Inskeep PB. In vitro and in vivo studies to characterize the clearance mechanism and potential cytochrome P450 interactions of anidulafungin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Mar;53(3):1149-56. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01279-08. Epub 2008 Nov 24. PMID 19029327
- BACKGROUNDKrause DS, Reinhardt J, Vazquez JA, Reboli A, Goldstein BP, Wible M, Henkel T; Anidulafungin Invasive Candidiasis Study Group. Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin in invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun;48(6):2021-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2021-2024.2004. PMID 15155194
- BACKGROUNDPappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 1;48(5):503-35. doi: 10.1086/596757. PMID 19191635
- BACKGROUNDReboli AC, Rotstein C, Pappas PG, Chapman SW, Kett DH, Kumar D, Betts R, Wible M, Goldstein BP, Schranz J, Krause DS, Walsh TJ; Anidulafungin Study Group. Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2472-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066906. PMID 17568028
- BACKGROUNDDe Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Munoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 15;46(12):1813-21. doi: 10.1086/588660.