Clinical trial · Interventional
Gemcitabine, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
A Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Gemcitabine or Capecitabine Based Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy that uses a 3-dimensional image of the tumor to help focus thin beams of radiation directly on the tumor, and giving radiation therapy in higher doses over a shorter period of time, may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects. It is not yet known which regimen of chemotherapy given together with radiation therapy is more effective in treating pancreatic cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is comparing the side effects of two regimens of gemcitabine and capecitabine given together with radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic Cancer | Malignant Pancreatic Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (4)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy | Radiation | — | UNRESOLVED |
| capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine | ALIAS |
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | Gemcitabine | ALIAS |
| quality-of-life assessment | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Gemcitabine
- description
- GEMCAP induction chemotherapy (28 day cycle of IV gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 day 1, 8,15 and capecitabine 830mg/m2 bd for 21 days po) followed by gemcitabine 300mg/m2 weekly (IV) + 50.4Gy radiation over five and half weeks (1.8Gy per fraction, Monday-Friday)
- interventionNames
- Drug: capecitabine
- Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride
- Procedure: quality-of-life assessment
- Radiation: 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- chemoradiotherpay with capecitabine
- description
- GEMCAP induction chemotherapy (28 day cycle of IV gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 day 1, 8,15 and capecitabine 830mg/m2 bd for 21 days po), followed by capecitabine 830mg/m2 bd (po, Mon-Fri) + 50.4Gy radiation over five and half weeks (1.8Gy per fraction, Monday-Friday)
- interventionNames
- Drug: capecitabine
- Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 120 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
* Locally advanced, nonmetastatic, inoperable, or operable (but medically unfit for surgery) disease
* Palliative bypass procedure allowed
* Common bile duct stenting allowed
* Primary pancreatic lesion ≤ 7 cm in diameter as measured by CT scan of the thorax and abdomen within 4 weeks prior to registration
* No recurrent cancer following definitive pancreatic surgery
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* WHO performance status (PS) 0-2
* Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L
* Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L
* Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
* Serum bilirubin \< 35 μmol/L (50 μmol/L allowed for patients who have had a recent biliary drain and whose bilirubin is descending)
* AST/ALT ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times ULN
* GFR \> 50 mL/min
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 12 weeks after completion of study therapy
* No evidence of severe uncontrolled systemic diseases including uncontrolled coronary artery disease
* No myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 6 months
* No prior malignancies within the past 5 years except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, adequately treated basal cell skin carcinoma, or any early-stage malignancy
* No suspected DPD deficiency
* No renal abnormalities (e.g., adult polycystic kidney disease, hydronephrosis, or ipsilateral single kidney)
* Must meet the following additional criteria for randomization:
* WHO PS 0-1
* Loss of weight no greater than 10% of that at baseline
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 4 weeks since prior and no concurrent sorivudine or analogues
* No prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
* No concurrent methotrexate
* No concurrent allopurinolReferences
Publications (3)
- RESULTMukherjee S, Hurt CN, Bridgewater J, Falk S, Cummins S, Wasan H, Crosby T, Jephcott C, Roy R, Radhakrishna G, McDonald A, Ray R, Joseph G, Staffurth J, Abrams RA, Griffiths G, Maughan T. Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Apr;14(4):317-26. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70021-4. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PMID 23474363
- RESULTFokas E, Spezi E, Patel N, Hurt C, Nixon L, Chu KY, Staffurth J, Abrams R, Mukherjee S. Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Aug;120(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3. PMID 27497804
- RESULTFokas E, Clifford C, Spezi E, Joseph G, Branagan J, Hurt C, Nixon L, Abrams R, Staffurth J, Mukherjee S. Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumor volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the pretrial benchmark case for the SCALOP trial. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 29. PMID 26328939