Clinical trial · Interventional
ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cetuximab | Drug | Cetuximab | ALIAS |
| Panitumumab | Drug | Panitumumab | ALIAS |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Cetuximab
- description
- Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) every 7 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death.
- interventionNames
- Drug: Cetuximab
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Panitumumab
- description
- Panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days. Participants were treated until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death.
- interventionNames
- Drug: Panitumumab
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Overall Survival
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease * Wild-type KRAS tumor status * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2 * Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease * Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) * Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function Exclusion Criteria: * Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment * Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib) * Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization. * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization
References
Publications (7)
- BACKGROUNDPrice T, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Guan X, Peeters M. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;68:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 5. PMID 27716478
- BACKGROUNDPrice TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Suresh AS, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Zhang K, Murugappan S, Sidhu R. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):569-79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70118-4. Epub 2014 Apr 14. PMID 24739896
- BACKGROUNDKim TW, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J, Ang AL, Bach BA, Price T. Impact of Emergent Circulating Tumor DNA RAS Mutation in Panitumumab-Treated Chemoresistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5602-5609. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3377. Epub 2018 Jun 13. PMID 29898991
- BACKGROUNDPeeters M, Price T, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Ruff P, Gibbs P, Thomas A, Demonty G, Hool K, Ang A. Evaluation of Emergent Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Panitumumab in the ASPECCT Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1216-1225. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2072. Epub 2018 Nov 28. PMID 30487126
- BACKGROUNDPrice T, Ang A, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, Satya Suresh A, Thomas A, Tjulandin S, Peeters M. Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020 Oct 2;21(10):891-898. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695. Epub 2020 Oct 7. PMID 33026965