Clinical trial · Interventional
SentoClone® Compared to Reference Treatment in Advanced Malignant Melanoma
A Multi-centre, Two-arm, Randomized, Open, Phase II Study Investigating SentoClone® Compared to Reference Treatment in Advanced Malignant Melanoma
NCT00991250CI-TRIAL-00003107unknownPhase 2ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether SentoClone® gives improved treatment responses in patients with advanced malignant melanoma in comparison to established reference treatment(s).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant Melanoma | Melanoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| SentoClone® | Biological | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Temodal® or Dacarbazine Medac® | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- SentoClone®
- description
- SentoClone®: Specific tumour-reactive lymphocytes located in lymph nodes directly draining primary tumours or metastases are identified and expanded. These lymphocytes are infused to the patient to treat metastatic disease.
- interventionNames
- Biological: SentoClone®
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Temodal® or Dacarbazine Medac®
- description
- To be decided by each centre as one of the following: 1. Temodal® (temozolomide) 2. Dacarbazine Medac® (dacarbazine) The reference treatment regimen should follow the general guiding principles for each of the two reference treatments.
- interventionNames
- Drug: Temodal® or Dacarbazine Medac®
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria To be eligible for inclusion in this study, the patients must fulfil all of the following criteria: 1. Surgically incurable stage III or IV malignant melanoma 2. At least one measurable lesion 3. WHO performance status 0-1 4. Life expectancy \> 3 months 5. Diagnosed metastasis 6. One tumour draining lymph node surgically accessible 7. Measurable tumour manifestation after the harvest of tumour tissue and sentinel/metinel nodes(1) 8. Signed informed consent (1) Should be fulfilled after surgery (visit 2) for patients randomised to SentoClone®. Exclusion Criteria To be eligible for inclusion in this study the patients must not meet any of the following criteria: 1\. Known allergy against used trace substance patent blue and/or albumin technetium (Nanocoll) 2. Known allergy against gentamicin and/or phenol red 3. Any condition (medical, social, psychological or legal) that influences adequate information negatively or is considered to be a problem for the patient to cope with treatment and follow-up 4. Aplastic anaemia or myelofibrosis 5. Previous treatment with temozolomide or dacarbazine, or any other chemotherapy during the last 3 months 6. Disease progression following treatment with temozolomide or dacarbazine more than 3 months back(1) 7. Previous radiotherapy of target lesion(s) or tumour draining lymph nodes which will be used for lymphocyte extraction(2) 8. Ongoing systemic steroid treatment or other treatment influencing immune defence 9. History of other malignant tumour disease apart from adequately treated basalioma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin more than 5 years ago 10. Positive test(s) for HIV and/or Hepatitis B and/or Hepatitis C and/or syphilis 11. Condition or disease which could influence the result of the study or which indicates that the patient runs risks by participating in this study 12. Participation in any other clinical study, involving other investigational methods or products that may influence the results of this trial, within 30 days prior to participating in this trial 1. Patients who responded on the treatment, terminated the treatment at least 3 months prior to the study, and later progressed do not fulfill exclusion criterion 6 2. Irradiated lesions are not considered to be measurable and are therefore not suitable as target lesions. Lesions which have been irradiated but shown progression are considered as measurable.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.