Clinical trial · Interventional
Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 Alone and in Combination With Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (LDAC)in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients
A Randomised, Open-label, Multi-centre, 2-stage, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 Alone and in Combination With Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (LDAC) in Comparison With LDAC Alone in Patients Aged ≥ 60 With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD1152 alone and in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) in comparison with LDAC alone in AML patients.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZD1152 | Drug | Barasertib | ALIAS |
| LDAC | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- AZD1152 1200 mg
- description
- AZD1152 1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion monotherapy
- interventionNames
- Drug: AZD1152
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- LDAC 20 mg
- description
- LDAC 20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days (400mg per cycle)
- interventionNames
- Drug: LDAC
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Percentage of Patients With Overall Complete Response for Stage I
- timeFrame
- IWG Cheson criteria every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 60 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Provision of written informed consent * Newly diagnosed male or female patients aged 60 and over * De Novo or Secondary AML * Not eligible for intensive induction with anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy as a result of at least one of the following:Age ≥75 years; Adverse cytogenetics, e.g., as defined by the MRC Prognostic Groupings; WHO performance status \>2; Organ dysfunction arising from significant co-morbidities not directly linked to leukaemia Exclusion Criteria: * Participation in another clinical study in which an investigational product was received within 14 days before the first dose in this study, or at any time if the patient has not recovered from side-effects associated with that investigational product * Administration of LDAC is clinically contraindicated * Patients with AML of FAB M3 classification Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL) * Patients with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukaemia
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDQuintas-Cardama A, Ravandi F, Liu-Dumlao T, Brandt M, Faderl S, Pierce S, Borthakur G, Garcia-Manero G, Cortes J, Kantarjian H. Epigenetic therapy is associated with similar survival compared with intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012 Dec 6;120(24):4840-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-436055. Epub 2012 Oct 15. PMID 23071272