Clinical trial · Observational
Conventional Bronchoscopy Plus Rose Versus Electromagnetic Navigation (EMN) Plus Rose in Small Peripheral Lesions
Comparison of the Electromagnetic Navigation System and Rapid on Site Evaluation Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy and Rapid on Site Evaluation: Improved Yield in Small Peripheral Lung Lesions(Original Investigation)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The aim of this study is to evaluate if Electromagnetic navigation (ENB) in combination with rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) can improve diagnostic accuracy in those patients who fail to be diagnosed with conventional fluoroscopic assisted bronchoscopy (FBS) in combination with ROSE.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benign Lung Lesions | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Lung Cancer | Malignant Lung Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
| Secondary Lung Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- 36-40 patients
- description
- patients with small peripheral lesions who need bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- To evaluate the percentages of diagnosis that can be obtained adding ENB to conventional bronchoscopy in the same patient
- timeFrame
- 1 year
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * presence of small peripheral lung lesions (\< 3 cm) in patient suitable for surgical procedure Exclusion Criteria: * patient with metastatic disease * patients unfit for surgical procedure
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available