Clinical trial · Interventional
A Randomized Trial Of PF-00299804 Taken Orally Versus Erlotinib Taken Orally For Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Progressed After One Or Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Of Pf-00299804 Versus Erlotinib For The Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure Of At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
NCT00769067CI-TRIAL-00019363completedPhase 2Results postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study will compare PF-00299804 given orally on continuous schedule to the approved drug, erlotinib, in patients whose non-small cell lung cancer has progressed after chemotherapy; patients will be randomized to receive one of these drugs, and followed for efficacy and tolerance of each.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erlotinib | Drug | Erlotinib | ALIAS |
| PF-00299804 | Drug | Dacomitinib | ALIAS |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- A
- interventionNames
- Drug: Erlotinib
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- B
- interventionNames
- Drug: PF-00299804
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
- timeFrame
- Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
- description
- PFS: Time in weeks from randomization to date of objective disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated as (first event date or last known event-free date \[if the event date unavailable\] minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 7. Objective progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest dimensions (LDs) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LD recorded since the treatment started and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 99 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * advanced measurable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC); * progressed after 1-2 prior chemotherapy; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2; * tissue available for future KRAS/ EGFR testing Exclusion Criteria: * prior Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy; * active or untreated Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases;
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDRamalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13. PMID 26768165