Clinical trial · Interventional
Case Collection Study to Support Digital Mammography Image Software Change
A Multi-center Feature Analysis Study to Compare the Diagnostic Accuracy of Siemens' Image Processing (SIP) Algorithms With Lorad's Image Processing (LIP) Algorithms in Detecting and Characterizing Breast Lesions
NCT00756496CI-TRIAL-00048652LIP2SIPcompletedN/AResults postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary objective of this study is to compare image processing software to support a new image processing software application for a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mammography screening and diagnosis | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- 1
- interventionNames
- Device: Mammography screening and diagnosis
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare Diagnostic Accuracy of 2 Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
- timeFrame
- ~1 year. Women with negative or biopsy benign findings at baseline (study entry) were followed for 1 year to confirm the negative status at 1-year follow-up mammography exam. Women diagnosed with cancer were not followed up.
- description
- The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Siemens' processing algorithm to Lorad's processing algorithm with regards to readers' diagnostic accuracy in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. The non-inferiority analyses were performed by comparing the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the two algorithms \& to compare false positive marks per subject. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. It shows in a graphical way the trade-off between clinical sensitivity and specificity for every possible cut-off for a test, and gives an idea about the benefit of using the test in question. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the reader assessments. A breast-based analysis was used for the primary AUC comparison in order to obtain additional power by having more normal/benign breasts.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 40 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Female * \> 40 years Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant women, or women who may become pregnant * Mammographic evidence of breast surgery, prior radiation to the breast, needle projection or pre-biopsy markings are evident in the mammogram (but may include breast implants) * Palpable lesion or one that is visible by another modality * Inmates
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.