Clinical trial · Observational
Experimental Device to Improve Colonoscopy
A Trial of Segmental Stiffening Wires to Improve the Efficiency and Patient Tolerability of Colonoscopy
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study will test the use of a new device called a segmental stiffening wire (SSW) in colonoscopy to correct a problem called looping. Colonoscopy is the best test for detecting early colon cancer and removing growths called polyps, which can become colon cancer. Sometimes the flexible tube (colonoscope) used in the procedure loops at a certain point as it advances through the colon, making it difficult to move further and causing the patient pain from excessive stretching of the colon. The SSW is designed to prevent this by stiffening the part of the tube that would otherwise form the loop. Healthy subjects between 50 and 80 years of age and healthy subjects 40 years and older who have a family history of colon cancer may be eligible for this study. Participants undergo colonoscopy a day after self-administering a bowel cleansing preparation. The first part of the procedure is done similarly to that of a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and no sedation or pain medication is used. The colonoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced about one-third the length of the colon. Pain or discomfort should be mild to moderate cramping and a feeling of having to move the bowels. The subject is asked to score his or her pain level at this point using a standard pain scale. If there is pain, the procedure is stopped and an x-ray is taken to determine if the colonoscope has looped. If it has, the loop is undone and the SSW is used. Another x-ray is then taken to document that the loop has been prevented with the SSW, and the procedure is completed as per standard medical practice. Subjects are taken to the recovery area, informed of the test results and then discharged home in the care of an accompanying adult.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colon Cancer Screening | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Colonoscopy | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Looping | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Prevent Looping | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- label
- Phase 1: Single Colonoscopy
- description
- Feasibility testing using the segmental stiffening wire
- label
- Phase 2; Not randomized
- description
- Phase 2 participants who did not have looping during first colonoscopy
- label
- Phase 2: Randomized to SSW during first colonoscopy
- description
- Phase 2 participants in whom looping occurred on first biopsy, randomized to subsequent use of segmental stiffening wire, then colonoscopy with no segmental stiffening wire upon repeat colonoscopy the next day.
- label
- Phase 2: Randomized to SSW during second colonoscopy
- description
- Phase 2 participants in whom looping occurred on first biopsy, randomized to no subsequent use of the segmental stiffening wire that day, then colonoscopy with segmental stiffening wire upon repeat colonoscopy the next day.
Primary outcomes (2)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 40 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Colonoscopy is indicated based on well-established national guidelines. This includes volunteers age 50 or greater who are at average risk for colon cancer, and volunteers age 40 or greater who are at increased risk based on a personal history of colon polyps or a family history of colon polyps or cancer. Volunteer meets the criteria of Anesthesia Level 1 or 2. Volunteer agrees to undergo the study procedures. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Ongoing psychiatric history including volunteers who have been hospitalized for psychiatric reasons, have missed significant number of days of work for psychiatric reasons, or who admit to suicidal ideations. Former or current history of alcohol or drug dependency. History of colonic resection. Pregnancy. Age greater than 80 or less than 40. Prior radiation to the abdomen or pelvis. American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade 3, 4, or 5. Allergy or other contraindications to midazolam or fentanyl.
References
Publications (3)
- BACKGROUNDMeissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Feb;15(2):389-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0678. PMID 16492934
- BACKGROUNDKahi CJ, Rex DK. Current and future trends in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2004 Jan-Jun;23(1-2):137-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1025871231346. PMID 15000154
- BACKGROUNDWu GH, Wang YM, Yen AM, Wong JM, Lai HC, Warwick J, Chen TH. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries. BMC Cancer. 2006 May 24;6:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-136. PMID 16723013