Clinical trial · Interventional
Efficacy of Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus(vs) Cisplatin and Capecitabine in Patients With Esophago-Gastric Cancer
A Prospective, Open, Comparative Multicentre Phase II Study for the Evaluation of Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Cisplatin and Capecitabine in Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastric-Oesophagal Junction
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to determine which Arm (capecitabine + irinotecan versus capecitabine + cisplatin) shows higher response rates in the treatment of advanced gastric-oesophagal cancer Furthermore, comparison of progression-free survival, 1-year survival, Quality of Life and safety
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric Cancer | Malignant Gastric Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin, Irinotecan, Capecitabine | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- response rate
Secondary outcomes (5)
- measure
- safety
- measure
- progression free survival
- measure
- 1 year survival
- measure
- Quality of Life
- measure
- Analysis of the dose and efficacy of Epoetin beta weekly in anaemic patients
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * gastric or gastric-oesophagal junction adenocarcinoma * unidimensional measurable disease * Karnofsky index \>/=60% Exclusion Criteria: * prior chemo- or radiotherapy * colorectal diseases * brain metastases
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available