Clinical trial · Observational
QOL & Functional Outcomes After Combined Modality Tx for Anal CA: Comparison of Conventional vs IMRT
Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Combined Modality Therapy for Anal Cancer: A Comparison of Conventional Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ANAL0002)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Inadequate response to Scientific Review Committee.
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is show that intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as compared with conventional radiotherapy, improves the precision of tumor targeting and reduces the acute and late effects of radiation toxicity when used to treat anal cancer. Results from this work will provide a basis for incorporating the use of IMRT to treat anal cancer in future treatment protocols.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anal Cancer | Malignant Anal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Evaluate the late effects of radiation treatment
- timeFrame
- one day
- description
- Quality of life questionnaires
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 30 Years
- Maximum age
- 70 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:Histologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Must be able to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria:History of new malignancy since the time of treatment for anal cancer. Non-English speaking.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available