Clinical trial · Interventional
A Randomized Trial of External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Cryoablation in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
A Randomized Trial of External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Cryoablation in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT00489060CI-TRIAL-00001573completedPhase 3ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
A trial to determine if cryoablation is as effective as radiation in the treatment of men with localized prostate cancer.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate Cancer | Malignant Prostate Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation and External Beam Radiation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- No evidence of disease progression (NEDP) at 36 months
- timeFrame
- 36 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Prostate biopsy status
- timeFrame
- 36 months post treatment
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Clinically localized prostate cancer * PSA \< 20ng/ml * Negative bone scan Exclusion Criteria: * Previous TURP * Previous hormone therapy
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.