Clinical trial · Interventional
Positron Emission Tomography Scan and CT Scan in Planning Radiation Therapy for Patients With Stage II or Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Comparative Study of Gross Tumor Volume Definition With or Without PET Fusion for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as positron emission tomography (PET) scan and CT scan, may help doctors plan radiation therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well a combined PET scan and CT scan works compared to a CT scan alone in planning radiation therapy for patients with stage II or stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lung Cancer | Malignant Lung Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| computed tomography | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| positron emission tomography | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Arm 1
- description
- Two radiation oncologists are randomly assigned to develop either a 3DCRT plan using CT only, or a 3DCRT plan using fused PET/CT
- interventionNames
- Procedure: computed tomography
- Procedure: positron emission tomography
Primary outcomes (5)
- measure
- The impact of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT fusion planning on GTV (cm³) vs. planning with CT scan alone
- timeFrame
- Two treatment plans are centrally reviewed to determine the difference in gross tumor volume between the plans
- measure
- The impact of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT fusion planning on number of contoured lymph nodes vs. planning with CT scan alone
- timeFrame
- Two treatment plans are centrally reviewed to determine the difference in number of contoured lymph nodes between the plans
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) * Stage IIA/IIB or stage IIIA/IIIB disease * Planning to undergo radiotherapy * Local or regional nodal recurrence after surgery allowed * No malignant pleural effusion PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Zubrod performance status 0-2 * Negative pregnancy test * Not pregnant or nursing * Fertile patients must use effective contraception PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * Concurrent neoadjuvant and/or concurrent chemotherapy allowed * No concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy
References
Publications (1)
- RESULTBradley J, Bae K, Choi N, Forster K, Siegel BA, Brunetti J, Purdy J, Faria S, Vu T, Thorstad W, Choy H. A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):435-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.033. Epub 2010 Nov 13. PMID 21075551