Clinical trial · Interventional
Radiation Therapy and Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Stage II or Stage III Rectal Cancer
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing in a Preoperative Schedule the Result of Two Concurrent Chemoradiation Schemes (45 Gy + Capecitabine vs 50 Gy + Capecitabine - Oxaliplatin) on the Rate of Sterilization of the Operative Specimen in Resectable Rectal Carcinomas T3-4 No-2 Mo
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy together with combination chemotherapy before surgery may shrink the tumor so it can be removed. It is not yet known whether giving radiation therapy together with capecitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin before surgery in treating rectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin to see how well they work compared to radiation therapy and capecitabine in treating patients who are undergoing surgery for stage II or stage III rectal cancer.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (5)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine | ALIAS |
| conventional surgery | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| neoadjuvant therapy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| oxaliplatin | Drug | Oxaliplatin | ALIAS |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Radiothérapie + Xelox
- interventionNames
- Drug: capecitabine
- Drug: oxaliplatin
- Procedure: conventional surgery
- Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy
- Radiation: radiation therapy
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Radiothérapie + Capécitabine
- interventionNames
- Drug: capecitabine
- Procedure: conventional surgery
- Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy
- Radiation: radiation therapy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Rate of complete surgical resection
Secondary outcomes (6)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum
* T3-4, N0-2, M0 disease by endorectal ultrasound
* T2 disease located in the low rectum allowed provided lower pole is ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge
* Tumor must be accessible to digital rectal examination (i.e., tumor located at low- or mid-rectum)
* Resectable disease treatable with chemoradiotherapy
* No unresectable disease (i.e., T4 disease with high risk for incomplete gross resection \[i.e., R2\])
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
* 18 to 80
Performance status
* ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy
* Not specified
Hematopoietic
* WBC ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
* Hemoglobin \> 10 g/dL
Hepatic
* Alkaline phosphatase normal
* Bilirubin normal
Renal
* Creatinine ≤ 130 μmol/L
* No severe renal insufficiency
Cardiovascular
* No cardiac insufficiency
* No symptomatic coronary artery disease
Other
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No contraindication to study treatment
* Prior acute intestinal obstruction allowed provided patient underwent surgical diversion with stoma
* No history of other cancer except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No peripheral neuropathy
* No uncontrolled diabetes
* No other uncontrolled severe disease
* No geographical, social, or psychological condition that would preclude study follow-up
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
* Not specified
Chemotherapy
* No prior chemotherapy for cancer
* No other concurrent chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
* Not specified
Radiotherapy
* No prior radiotherapy for cancer
Surgery
* Not specified
Other
* No concurrent phenytoin
* No concurrent participation in another clinical trial of an experimental medical treatmentReferences
Publications (2)
- RESULTGerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Laffay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, Vendrely V, Francois E, de La Roche G, Bouche O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah JF, Mahe MA, Becouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Montoto-Grillot C, Conroy T. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1638-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376. Epub 2010 Mar 1. PMID 20194850
- DERIVEDAzria D, Doyen J, Jarlier M, Martel-Lafay I, Hennequin C, Etienne P, Vendrely V, Francois E, de La Roche G, Bouche O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah J, Mahe M, Becouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Seitz J, Bedenne L, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Juzyna B, Conroy T, Gerard J. Late toxicities and clinical outcome at 5 years of the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for intermediate-risk rectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2436-2442. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx351. PMID 28961836