Clinical trial · Interventional
Conventional or Video-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Lung Metastases
Phase III Randomized Prospective Trial of Open Versus Minimally Invasive, Video-Assisted Resection of Pulmonary Metastases
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
RATIONALE: Video-assisted surgery may have fewer side effects than conventional surgery in patients with lung metastases. It is not yet known whether conventional surgery or video-assisted surgery is more effective in treating lung metastases. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of conventional surgery with that of video-assisted surgery in treating patients who have lung metastases.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metastatic Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.78 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| surgical procedure | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- surgery
- description
- Patients undergo open resection (thoracotomy, median sternotomy, or bilateral sternothoracotomy). Patients with isolated recurrence in the chest should have the recurrence(s) resected if feasible. The original resection approach (open versus VATS) should be the preferred method for the second resection, but is not required. Quality of life is assessed prior to randomization and then at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: surgical procedure
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- video-assisted surgery
- description
- After spiral CT showing pulmonary nodules are amenable to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection with curative intent, patients undergo minimally-invasive video-assisted resection. Patients with isolated recurrence in the chest should have the recurrence(s) resected if feasible. The original resection approach (open versus VATS) should be the preferred method for the second resection, but is not required. Quality of life is assessed prior to randomization and then at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed pulmonary metastases (unilateral or bilateral) identified by spiral CT scan No primary lung cancer Documented previous cancer with no history of prior metastasectomy Primary tumor must be definitively controlled No evidence of primary tumor recurrence, either locally or systemically No extrapulmonary metastatic disease or evidence of mediastinal lymph node involvement Lymph nodes greater than 1.0 cm on CT scan must be proven to be benign by tissue biopsy (mediastinoscopy) All lesions must be amenable to minimally invasive resection Must be amenable to video-assisted thoracic surgery with curative intent (complete removal of all documented lesions) No greater than 4 lesions PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Over 18 Performance status: CALGB 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified Pulmonary: See Disease Characteristics PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Not specified Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: Not specified Surgery: See Disease Characteristics
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available