Skip to content
CancerIndex

Publication

Investigational Clinical Trial Agents versus Conventional Second Salvage Therapies in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Daniel Nguyen, Hagop M Kantarjian, Aram Bidikian, Christopher M Manuel, Wei Qiao, Jing Ning, Courtney D DiNardo, Tapan M Kadia, Naval Daver, Gautam Borthakur, Elias Jabbour, Musa Yilmaz, Abhishek Maiti, Koji Sasaki, Guillermo Montalban-Bravo, Kelly Chien, Danielle Hammond, Sherry Pierce, Michael Andreeff, Farhad Ravandi, Nicholas J Short, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Ghayas C Issa

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer ResearchSep 15, 2026PMID 42329225doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-26-0951 Journal ArticlepubmedProvenance
Source
PubMed
Retrieved
Sep 29, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Run
ING-PUBMED-20260929-000001
Published

Abstract

Abstract (excerpt)

Only the opening of the abstract is shown; abstract text may carry publisher copyright.

PURPOSE: Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain discouraging despite the rapid expansion of treatment paradigms over the past decade. Clinicians must often decide between conventional salvage treatment regimens or enrollment in clinical…

Read on PubMed

Linked entities

Linked entities (1)

How each link was made (MeSH, dictionary, registry reference, curation…) and whether it has been validated. Candidate links are not counted in entity statistics.

Candidate 1

Curated evidence

Evidence citing this paper (0)

Data not yet available

No curated evidence item cites this publication.